Monday, January 26, 2026
BTC: $88,053 +1.93% ADA: $0.3514 +3.75% ETH: $2,919 +4.19% XRP: $1.90 +3.56% SOL: $124.16 +4.54%

Institutional U-Turn: ETFs Bleed $713M as ‘Greenland Panic’ Hits Markets

A $713M ETF exodus led by GBTC and FBTC signals a sharp risk-off pivot as Greenland tariff threats and Japanese bond yields rattle global liquidity.

The 2026 rally just hit a geopolitical wall.

U.S. crypto ETFs hemorrhaged $713 million in net outflows Tuesday, marking a violent reversal of early-year inflows. The catalyst wasn’t protocol failure or regulatory enforcement, but a macro shockwave: renewed U.S.-EU trade tensions over Greenland and a liquidity crisis in Japanese government bonds (JGBs).

Institutional investors didn’t just trim positions; they fled. Grayscale’s GBTC led the exodus with $160.8 million in withdrawals, followed closely by Fidelity’s FBTC at $152 million. Ether products fared no better. BlackRock’s ETHA shed $92.3 million, snapping a five-day inflow streak. The sheer velocity of the exit, $1.13 billion leaving Bitcoin funds in 48 hours, erased the gains from the year’s first trading week.

Macro Contagion: Bonds Break, Crypto Follows

The narrative has shifted from adoption to survival. President Trump’s threat of 10-25% tariffs on European nations sparked a “sell everything” rotation, but the real damage came from Tokyo. The 30-year JGB yield surged to 3.91%, destabilizing a critical global liquidity backstop. Risk assets plummeted in unison.

Bitcoin failed to hold support at $89,000 (-4%), while Ether tumbled below the psychological $3,000 line. Volume evaporated.

The relentless surge in long-dated JGB yields signals that one of the world’s most reliable liquidity backstops is fading. Ole Hansen, Saxo Bank

Solana remained the lone outlier in the carnage. While majors bled, SOL products attracted $3.8 million in net inflows, suggesting smart money is rotating rather than retreating entirely. LVRG Research Director Nick Ruck noted the move reflects “temporary institutional derisking” rather than a structural exit. Investors are waiting for the tariff rhetoric to cool.